Imported post
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Kongo @ April 04 2004,07:44)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Now for my question, is it or is it not that lousy quality people describes?[/QUOTE]<span id='postcolor'>
In a word, no. The quality is fine overall, both in design and build. Perhaps not as trouble-free as Japanese brands or more established models but the difference is small. You can expect a relatively trouble-free ownership for several years. After that who knows. Past Volvos have been durable. Probably the first thing to go after a dozen years will be electronics and plastic parts.
A very few owner reports on the internet describe major, isolated problems but these are unverified, lack detail and are by one-time posters. The vast majority of owners who frequent the forums have only a few minor complaints or wish that something were designed differently. Read for yourself.
The U.S. Consumer Reports gave the XC90 a poor reliability rating but, as it turns out, this was based on a small sample only a few months after introduction. Early difficulties like the e-brake have all but disappeared. Volvo did increase production and hire new workers, so quality may have suffered somewhat initially, although this is not uncommon in the auto industry. All the luxury brands have had to deal with it from time to time.
Sit back and enjoy. And keep us informed on how you and your car are doing.
'04 XC90 2.5T, ~170K miles, ash gold/graphite, 7-seater, towing, nav
"Objects in the mirror may be just as they appear." - Steve Forbert
Bookmarks