I was searching information on several 3309 fluids available and I came to the conclusion that the 3309 norm doesn't necessarily mean that all the fluid properties are identically the same no matter the brand. Without being an expert, when looking at some 'parameters' (flash point, pour point, viscosity, etc) we can notice there are differences between these fluids. I had a not so good experience with Valvoline MaxLife which is 3309 (too much volume change with temperature), so perhaps going with the better brands (Toyota Type IV and Mobil 3309) is the better and safer choice. One interesting thing is that on the spec sheet for the Toyota Type IV, at the top of the page 3, it is mentioned that the fluid is 90-100% mineral, so perhaps this answers an older debate on whether these fluids are mineral or not. And of course, I think most of us recommend to replace the fluid at a certain interval (unlike what the main dealer says), perhaps better by steps at a few months interval, instead of all at once (also no garage machine flushing)
Specs for Mannol Atf 3309 (sold in Europe) https://mannol.de/imgbank/Image/publ...ehicle_tds.pdf
Mobil 3309 Atf http://www.chemcorp.co.uk/creo_files...l_atf_3309.pdf
Valvoline MaLife 3309 http://www.valvolineeurope.com/uploadedFiles/2451.pdf
Toyota Type IV http://southcentral.edu/webdocs/safe...ATF%20T-IV.pdf
Beck&Arnley Type IV Atf https://www.beckarnley.com/content/d...eet_031218.pdf
Bookmarks