Calling webmaster

[barrysharp]

I think you should eliminate the post count and member category altogether. To me it serves no benefit -- whether a member has posted 10 times or a 1000 times means what? The member name is all that really counts for recognition IMO.

IMO you should keep those stats internally (if you need to) as showing them publically arouses some members.

[bxs]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">To me it serves no benefit -- whether a member has posted 10 times or a 1000 times means what?[/QUOTE]<span id='postcolor'>

See what I mean.

[Gundo]

Mungo like arousal&#33;

[Nick Roger]

oh no&#33; &nbsp;
as soon as I got Xcer certificate Coastal makes me another two mountains to climb&#33;&#33; &nbsp;

But to tell the truth i think there can&#39;t be nothing more than being an Xcer&#33; &nbsp;
What about changing it in :
50 posts senior
100 p veteran
200 p Xcer
??

mmh but i don&#39;t want to wait so much to become again an Xcer&#33;&#33;
&nbsp; &nbsp;

I love this forum&#33;

[NeuDaddi]

At this point, maybe we need to have additional user classifications for those that post 500, 1000, and 2000. &nbsp;While I tend to agree with Barry that it doesn&#39;t matter, I do think it helps in discussions to some degree. &nbsp;Its easy to tell if someone is a committed member of this community by how many posts they have.