Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 25 of 25
  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    1,442

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JRL View Post
    As I said, do 3 drain and fills at the same time if you don't do the Gibbons method.
    Obviously that only works if you run the engine in between otherwise you'll just drain out the new fluid again. Overall, you'll replace about 75% of the old fluid and use about 9qts.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
    Posts
    1,063

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stephenxc View Post
    Why not use the Valvoline Synthetic instead of the 3309?

    Stephen
    Now you've done it... You better duck your head.
    2005 XC70 Crystal Green | Hilton | 16T | Bad Swede | 130k miles

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    1,442

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stephenxc View Post
    Why not use the Valvoline Synthetic instead of the 3309?
    You can use any oil that meets the JWS 3309 specification, several people have used other oils without a problem. In general, people have found they can buy Mobil 3309 or Toyota T-IV at less cost that other synthetic fluids, hence there doesn't appear to be any advantage to using different fluid. One reason to be wary is that manufacturers have been known to change the specs in an oil or even change what specifications the oil meets. Mobil 1 MultiVehicle Synthetic ATF is a prime example, Mobil claimed it met the JWS 3309 spec but then withdrew that claim at a later date.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sjonnie View Post
    The concern DIYers have, myself included, is that they will screw something up. It's natural to worry that something you do will not work out how you intend, especially if it's something you're not familiar with. But the reality is, the transmission is designed to work with Mobil 3309 as it comes out of the bottle. That is, new fluid is perfect for the transmission, it is free of particulate matter and has the correct lubricant properties to ensure optimal functioning of the transmission. Old fluid is exactly that, old, worn out, contaminated and definitely not optimal. There is no benefit to running with old fluid or a mix of old fluid and new. Old fluid should be replaced, all of it, and the Volvo method does that in the best possible way by using the oil pump inside the transmission.
    I once made this mistake. I replaced all of the fluid at once on a transmission with about 70k miles with original fluid. A month later and about 3k miles it failed on me. Had to get a new transmission. Nothing was wrong BEFORE I replaced the fluid. Obviously I had waited too long to do this. The new fluid dislodged a bunch of build-up and clogged the little passages. The idea of a drain & fill 3 times with 200+ miles in between is that only so much can get dislodged at a time with only 3 or so quarts of fluid being new. Plus, anything that did come off is being drained soon after.
    After this is done at least 3 times, only then I would do a full flush.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Virginia Beach
    Posts
    4,118

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nelaco View Post
    I once made this mistake. I replaced all of the fluid at once on a transmission with about 70k miles with original fluid. A month later and about 3k miles it failed on me. Had to get a new transmission. Nothing was wrong BEFORE I replaced the fluid. Obviously I had waited too long to do this. The new fluid dislodged a bunch of build-up and clogged the little passages. The idea of a drain & fill 3 times with 200+ miles in between is that only so much can get dislodged at a time with only 3 or so quarts of fluid being new. Plus, anything that did come off is being drained soon after.
    After this is done at least 3 times, only then I would do a full flush.
    I think you're confusing correlation with causality. The flush didn't cause the failure, even though it immediately preceded it. The wear already happened before the flush, and it was on its last legs anyway....
    Current Fleet:
    2016 Tundra Crewmax 4WD 1794
    2005 MB S600 (126K, Michelin AS4, HPL 0W40)
    2005 MB SL600 (55K Michelin AS4, Mobil 1 0W40)
    2004 V70R (143K, six speed M66, HPL 5W40)
    2004 XC90 (235K, HPL 0W30 Euro)
    2002 V70-XC (295K, HPL 0W30 Euro)
    2002 V70-T5 (225K, IPD bars, Bilsteins)
    2001 V70-T5 (125K, IPD downpipe, cat back and other mods)
    1932 Packard Sedan (straight 8, dual sidemounts, original paint and interior, Shell Rotella 15W40)

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •