View Full Version : Lucas tranny conditioner works
Meat Popsicle
03-13-2008, 12:09 PM
My 01 has had all the updates, flush etc. Still had eratic, hard, missed etc shifting.
I put in the tranny conditioner. VIOLA. smooth as can be. nice shifts seesm very regular. Hot or cold I feel like i have my tranny back where is should be.
Any of you used it before?
I can tell it increases the viscosity. the additive is very thick take a bit to pour
Please post again after a few thousand miles and tell us if it still feels good
brbevil
03-13-2008, 05:32 PM
I used on my old Land Rover Discovery - What a difference. Lucas products are top notch. That being said however I have not placed in my xc70 yet. If that time comes I would not hesitate!
Meat Popsicle
03-13-2008, 06:54 PM
Please post again after a few thousand miles and tell us if it still feels good
600 as of today still feels great!
Omega5
03-18-2008, 06:40 AM
Which Product did you use? They have two transmission products listed on the site, what is the exact name of the product you used?
You may want to read this. Or not...
http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/images/lucas/lucas.htm
Forkster
03-18-2008, 07:46 AM
I'm with MoeB. BITOG[http://www.bobistheoilguy.com (http://www.bobistheoilguy.com) has a pretty good analysis on these addititives like Lucas. The results are well... they stink. They don't have enough anti-foam agents in them.
After putting in and running for a bit. (Images courtsey of BITOG)
http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/images/lucas/runningnolucas.jpg
After running for a while at higher speeds.
http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/images/lucas/normal140climb.jpg
It turned white because of the trapped air.
I can't tell you what that may do to your transmission...:eek:
To be fair, that BITOG write up is for a different product. Still, if their flagship product doesn't live up to the hype, it's hard for me to have much confidence in the rest of their line.
I looked at the MSDS sheet (http://www.lucasoil.com/images/medialibrary/product_msds_12.pdf) for Lucas Trans Fix. The viscosity cSt @ 100° C is listed as "greater than 60," yet on their data sheet (http://www.lucasoil.com/images/medialibrary/trans_fix.pdf) it is given as 48 "typical." It's also described as "slightly tacky." SAE 90W gear oil has a viscosity cSt range of 13.5 to 23.99. An oil with a cSt above 41 is SAE 250+. "Slightly tacky" is probably an understatement. Given that JWS 3309 is designed with friction modifiers specifically for the AW-5550's slipping lockup design, I would need some kind of proof that it's OK to add "tacky" SAE >250W oil to the ATF before I tried it.
Omega5
03-18-2008, 11:28 AM
Well done, proof collaboration works.
One more thing i got from BOB is that 100% synthetic is not as great as what it's cracked up to be. What do you guys get out of that?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.