My understanding is that the AW-55-50 SN is the FWD version and the AW-55-51 SN is the AWD version. While the valve body, clutches, etc, are the same between the two versions, the -51 has the extra gears in the differential section to drive the angle gear and the casting is changed to allow for the angle gear mount.
I really don't think that you can swap a -50 into an AWD setup, unless you want to simply delete the angle gear, and all the AWD stuff. You would need to get the FWD right hand driveshaft as well, as those are different parts between FWD and AWD. Not certain about the Left hand driveshaft...
I would bet that the gearboxes are the same between Petrol and Diesel. That is, a FWD (-50) box from a petrol would swap into a FWD diesel. And an AWD box (-51) would swap between petrol and diesel AWD cars.
In your case, the most certain course of action would be a rebuild of the box while it's off the car. This is a relatively common transmission, used in GM, Saab, Nissan, and Volvo models. Get the soft parts renewed and have the valve body overhauled. It won't be cheap, but "doesn't shift the best" combined with your year of manufacture suggests that it's time.
2000-2002 models of this transmission had a problem with valve body wear, particularly in the SLT solenoid bore. That solenoid controls line (hydraulic operating) pressure in the whole unit. Low pressure = poor shifting. The fix, generally, is valve body work, sometimes including a re-sleeving of that SLT bore.
As the owner of two cars with the same vintage of transmission, I've experienced this issue twice. In my case, addressed early, when the first symptoms began to appear, the transmissions were fixed by rebuilt valve bodies alone. The soft parts hadn't worn out yet. Both of those transmissions are still functioning well. My wife's XC has 229,000 miles on it. Still with the original transmission and its rebuilt valve body.
However, if the poor shifting has been present for a while, and since we are talking about a 17 year old transmission, I am going to suggest that a rebuild is your best option. You know, with absolute certainty, that it's the proper part for your car, and you'll know that it is completely renewed. A used transmission is just that: used. It might be great.
It might also be the reason that particular car was delivered to the recycler...
Before you give up on this transmission, it might be worth trying the two cheapest fixes: new B4 servo cover and complete fluid change. The cover was updated in about 2005. Your year pre-dates the updated cover, and a failed older design cover will cause shifting problems. You can find the updated B4 servo cover as a kit from your dealer (here in the US, it's readily available from the aftermarket). Search "Gibbons flush" on this forum for details on how to do a complete fluid change.
You'll need about 14 liters of compatible fluid for a complete fluid change. Please note: the dealer will sell you compatible fluid at an astronomical price. Any fluid meeting JWS-3309 is fine, including Toyota's own T-IV fluid, which is usually about 1/4 the price of Volvo's, and likely made in the same refinery. Idemitsu has come out with JWS-3309 fluid that might be relatively inexpensive in your market.
Were it my car, I would try cheap first, just to see if that fixes things...and if not, then it's off to find a good rebuilder...
Last edited by Astro14; 01-24-2018 at 06:53 AM.
Current Fleet:
2016 Tundra Crewmax 4WD 1794
2005 MB S600 (126K, Michelin AS4, HPL 0W40)
2005 MB SL600 (55K Michelin AS4, Mobil 1 0W40)
2004 V70R (143K, six speed M66, HPL 5W40)
2004 XC90 (235K, HPL 0W30 Euro)
2002 V70-XC (295K, HPL 0W30 Euro)
2002 V70-T5 (225K, IPD bars, Bilsteins)
2001 V70-T5 (125K, IPD downpipe, cat back and other mods)
1932 Packard Sedan (straight 8, dual sidemounts, original paint and interior, Shell Rotella 15W40)
Bookmarks